Governance Assurance & Capital Stewardship
Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) provides forward, likelihood-based insight into where owner accountability, authority or decision defensibility is most likely to diverge from approved intent as conditions evolve across complex, long-life assets. Applied above execution, GDI helps owners see emerging governance exposure early, while options remain available, without assuming intervention, displacing management or directing delivery. It supports informed choice about whether governance assurance attention is required, and if so, where and why.
Independent governance diagnostic insight for owners
Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) is an independent, owner-level governance diagnostic and assurance capability. It applies forward-looking analysis to identify where evolving conditions are increasing the likelihood of future owner exposure, loss of authority or erosion of decision defensibility.
GDI focuses on governance-critical signals across the asset lifecycle, including decision pathways, commitment patterns, interface stress, accountability shifts and control effectiveness. Using a combination of structured governance analysis, pattern recognition and judgement, GDI highlights where approved intent is most likely to come under pressure before outcomes become irreversible.
GDI does not replace management, delivery teams or operators. It does not assume that action is required. It exists to make emerging exposure visible early enough for owners to choose how to respond.
From early visibility to informed owner choice
GDI is applied to portfolios or individual assets to establish where governance attention should be focused as conditions change. It supports owners by prioritising where exposure is accumulating fastest relative to consequence, rather than applying uniform oversight across all assets.
The output of GDI is structured insight that informs whether:
Any subsequent response remains owner-directed, proportionate and time-bound. GDI enables disciplined, forward governance by ensuring decisions about oversight, assurance or escalation are informed by evidence and likelihood, not hindsight or pressure.
The lifecycle stages below demonstrate how Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) is applied to assess emerging governance exposure as assets progress from early decision-making through delivery, operation and transition. Further detail is available for each stage, outlining how GDI supports timely insight and defensible owner decisions.
Forward governance insight before capital is committed
Why it matters | Feasibility approval establishes the basis for proceeding, but it does not guarantee that the capital, cost, schedule and production assumptions approved at that point will ultimately hold. As commitments escalate, optionality reduces rapidly and the ability to correct foundational decisions diminishes. |
What GDI provides | Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) maintains forward visibility over whether the approved feasibility case is likely to remain valid as conditions evolve, highlighting early divergence between approved intent, emerging assumptions and downstream decision pathways while meaningful options remain available. |
What this enables | Earlier recognition of governance exposure, enabling owners to refresh decisions, adjust commitments or strengthen controls before capital is irreversibly committed and accountability hardens. |
Forward governance insight as commitments become binding
Why it matters | Engineering development and procurement translate approved feasibility assumptions into binding technical, commercial and contractual commitments. At this stage, flexibility reduces rapidly and early decisions can lock in cost, schedule and risk exposure long before delivery performance becomes visible or reversible. |
What GDI provides | Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) maintains forward visibility over whether engineering choices, procurement strategies and contracting structures are likely to preserve approved intent and decision authority, or introduce latent pressure that is more likely to surface later during execution. |
What this enables | Earlier recognition of emerging governance exposure, enabling owners to intervene before commitments harden, authority fragments and downstream options narrow. |
Forward governance insight as control is tested
Why it matters | During execution, complexity increases and responsibility becomes decentralised across contractors, operators and advisors. At the same time, owner visibility and direct control often reduce, while exposure to cost, schedule and performance outcomes accelerates and becomes harder to recover. |
What GDI provides | Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) maintains forward visibility over whether delivery behaviour, coordination and decision pathways are likely to remain aligned with approved intent and owner authority, highlighting early signals of emerging loss of control, accountability dilution or directional drift. |
What this enables | Earlier recognition of governance exposure, enabling owners to intervene before loss of control becomes embedded and remaining options narrow to reactive correction. |
Forward governance insight as performance is normalised
Why it matters | As projects transition into operations, unresolved delivery issues, latent defects and governance gaps can undermine safety, reliability and long-term performance. This stage often carries hidden exposure as accountability shifts, interfaces change and operational expectations begin to solidify. |
What GDI provides | Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) maintains forward visibility over whether the asset is stabilising as intended, or whether unresolved delivery assumptions, governance overload or dependency concentration are likely to erode operational predictability and owner control. |
What this enables | Earlier recognition of emerging fragility, enabling owners to address governance, accountability and dependency risks before they become embedded in long-term operating performance and difficult to unwind. |
Forward governance insight as long-term obligations crystallise
Why it matters | Closure and transition decisions carry long-term environmental, social and financial obligations that extend well beyond active operations or land-use cycles. These obligations often accumulate gradually across asset life, rotation or stewardship periods and can remain under-governed until accountability becomes difficult to reassign, remediate or defend. |
What GDI provides | Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) maintains forward visibility over whether closure or land transition assumptions, rehabilitation or recovery pathways and post-closure or post-transition responsibilities are likely to be met as intended as conditions evolve. This includes identifying where accountability may be fragmenting, long-term land exposure is increasing or residual risk is emerging. |
Outcome | Earlier recognition of future accountability exposure, enabling owners to address closure or transition readiness, residual obligations and legacy risk across long-life land assets, while authority remains clear and options for intervention still exist. |
Where Governance Decision Intelligence (GDI) indicates that governance exposure is material or decision defensibility may be weakening, owners can elect to apply a targeted governance assurance mandate to strengthen control, authority and accountability at the point it matters, without assuming execution responsibility.
Important context
Governance Decision Intelligence provides likelihood-based insight to support owner decision-making under uncertainty. It does not replace delivery accountability, operator responsibility or statutory assurance processes, nor does it predict or guarantee outcomes. Decisions and outcomes remain the responsibility of asset owners and their appointed delivery and operating parties.
Sarel Blaauw
senior partner
+61 498 785 165