Closure & end-of-use | TacminMadini

Closure and End-of-Use Governance provides independent assurance over structured closure, decommissioning, relinquishment and land-use conversion pathways. It governs sequencing, obligation management and stakeholder commitments to ensure outcomes remain compliant, auditable and aligned with long-term land intent. Residual liabilities, tenure conditions and future land capability are tested before formal sign-off or conversion proceeds. Rather than managing execution, the focus is on governing decisions, maintaining escalation discipline and ensuring closure or conversion outcomes preserve spatial capital and protect enduring land value.

Why it matters	Unclear closure or conversion pathways increase regulatory friction, sequencing risk and long-term exposure. Without disciplined definition of scope, timing and obligations, end-of-use decisions can undermine land value, delay approvals and weaken stakeholder confidence.
Our focus	We assure the structured definition of closure or land-use conversion pathways, including sequencing logic, dependency mapping and obligation clarity. Assumptions are tested and escalation thresholds reviewed at the owner level before commitments advance.
Outcome	Clear, defensible closure and conversion pathways that reduce uncertainty, strengthen approval confidence and protect long-term land intent.

Closure and end-of-use

Structured governance of decommissioning and land-use conversion

OUR FOCUS AREAS

Closure Pathway Definition

Obligation & Commitment Governance

Residual Risk & Capability Assessment

Governance Readiness for Sign-Off

Why it matters	Closure and end-of-use events often trigger heightened regulatory, environmental and community scrutiny. Poor control over undertakings, offsets or compliance commitments can create enduring liability and reputational exposure.
Our focus	We assure governance over regulatory conditions, stakeholder commitments and environmental obligations to ensure undertakings are traceable, proportionate and aligned with approved land strategy.
Outcome	Controlled and auditable commitment management that reduces residual liability and strengthens defensibility under review.

Why it matters	Residual liabilities, tenure settings or land capability limitations can materially influence post-closure value and future use. If these factors are not tested before sign-off, owners may inherit unintended exposure.
Our focus	We assure structured assessment of residual risks, land capability and tenure conditions before formal relinquishment or conversion proceeds, ensuring future use assumptions are realistic and defensible.
Outcome	Informed end-of-use decisions that protect spatial capital and reduce long-term land exposure.

Why it matters	Closure and conversion milestones often culminate in regulatory sign-off, asset transfer or ownership change. Weak governance documentation or unclear decision records can delay approval and increase scrutiny.
Our focus	We assure decision traceability, documentation integrity and delegation clarity at formal closure or conversion gateways to ensure readiness for regulatory, investor and stakeholder review.
Outcome	Defensible sign-off conditions that support compliant transition, reduce escalation risk and safeguard enduring land value.