Governance Assurance & Capital Stewardship
Independent entry points into governance assurance
Engagement pathways describe how boards, owners and executives initiate governance assurance in practice. While core mandates are applied at defined points of owner exposure across the asset lifecycle, engagements may commence at any stage - before capital commitment, during delivery, across operating assets or at transition and closure. Entry is shaped by where independent clarity, strengthened control or decision confidence is required to preserve capital discipline and long-term asset value.
Most engagements begin in one of three ways.
Proactive governance strengthening
Engaged where boards seek clarity, validation or confidence before instability arises. Applied to assess assumptions, alignment and control settings while exposure remains manageable and decisions remain defensible.
Engagement may commence through an independent review where boards or executives seek clarity on assumptions, governance structures, capital discipline or performance alignment. This pathway provides disciplined visibility and establishes whether enhanced governance assurance is warranted.
Active governance containment
Applied alongside active projects or operations where capital is committed and exposure must remain controlled. Provides structured monitoring and disciplined visibility to prevent drift from escalating into material instability.
Engagement may commence through a defined assurance mandate applied alongside active projects or operating assets. This pathway strengthens transparency, preserves authority and reinforces disciplined governance as conditions evolve across complex delivery and operating environments under sustained board oversight.
Governance restoration under pressure
Activated where alignment has weakened or exposure has intensified. Reasserts governance discipline and stabilises control structures to protect value, authority and decision defensibility during elevated risk conditions.
Engagement may commence where alignment has weakened, exposure has intensified or confidence requires reinforcement. This pathway restores governance discipline, strengthens decision control and stabilises outcomes under defined owner mandate and structured oversight frameworks with clear escalation protocols.
Engagement structure.
Each pathway is independently mandated, scoped and governed. Where multiple pathways are applied sequentially or concurrently, this occurs only under explicit owner direction and without creating dependency between mandates.
See how governance assurance supports confident decisions and defensible outcomes.
Sarel Blaauw
senior partner
+61 498 785 165