Closure verification | TacminMadini

Home
> Core services
> Closure governance
> Closure verification

Closure Verification & Land Transition provides independent, owner-side validation of closure outcomes to ensure environmental, regulatory and post-closure obligations have been met. Through structured verification, land condition assessment and transition planning, it confirms that rehabilitation aligns with approved objectives and withstands audit or regulatory scrutiny. Beyond compliance, it evaluates long-term land capability, residual risk and potential future use to support informed transition decisions. The focus is on transparent verification, reduced liability and responsible stewardship that enables closure to progress confidently toward sign-off and long-term land value protection.

Why it matters	Regulators and communities expect verifiable evidence that closure commitments have been met. Without structured verification, there is risk of non-compliance, delayed sign-off and increased long-term liability. Independent validation preserves credibility and reduces dispute potential.
Our focus	We verify environmental performance, land condition and closure outcomes against approved plans and regulatory requirements. Compliance data, monitoring results and audit evidence are assessed systematically to provide confidence in sign-off readiness.
Outcome	Clear, defensible verification of closure outcomes that supports regulatory approval, reduces future liability and strengthens stakeholder confidence in the integrity of rehabilitation activities.

Closure governance

Closure verification & land transition

Environmental & Compliance Verification

Residual Risk & Liability Assessment

Land Capability & Future Use Assessment

Handover & Transition Planning

Why it matters	Unidentified or unmitigated residual risks—environmental, geotechnical or financial—can become long-term liabilities for owners. Without assessment, closure may shift risk rather than resolve it, exposing organisations to ongoing monitoring costs or remediation.
Our focus	We assess residual risk and liability through structured evaluation of land behaviour, environmental impacts and closure durability. Findings are benchmarked against regulatory and ESG expectations to support responsible handover and liability management.
Outcome	Reduced long-term exposure and greater certainty around liability, enabling owners to transition land confidently and demonstrate accountable stewardship.

Why it matters	Closure success is not only about compliance but about viable long-term land capability. Without assessment, future land uses may be unsuitable or misaligned with rehabilitation outcomes, creating risk, cost or community dissatisfaction.
Our focus	We evaluate land condition, capability and constraints to identify viable post-closure uses aligned with environmental and community expectations. Transition pathways are clarified early to avoid rework and unrealistic planning assumptions.
Outcome	A clearer understanding of feasible land uses that supports transition planning, reduces uncertainty and protects long-term land value.

Why it matters	Transition from closure to post-closure stewardship is a critical risk point. Poorly planned handovers can create ambiguity around responsibilities, monitoring, maintenance and future obligations—leading to dispute or liability exposure.
Our focus	We structure handover processes that define roles, monitoring needs and documentation requirements. Responsibilities are clarified and supported with traceable evidence to reduce ambiguity and support regulatory and stakeholder acceptance.
Outcome	More predictable and accountable transition outcomes that support regulatory confidence, reduce long-term risk and position land for responsible future use.