Contractor & Execution Governance

Home
> Core services
> Closure governance
> Contractor & Execution

Contractor & Execution Governance applies owner-side oversight to ensure closure delivery remains compliant, disciplined and aligned with approved scope, environmental requirements and ESG expectations. Contractor performance, change control and environmental responsibilities are governed to reduce execution risk and strengthen accountability. Where owners mandate delivery, TacminMadini can assume execution under a single accountable framework, maintaining transparency and traceability across cost, schedule and quality. The focus is on controlled execution, defensible decisions and measurable outcomes that support compliant closure and reduce long-term liability.

Why it matters	Weak contractor performance oversight increases the likelihood of delay, cost escalation and non-compliance. When performance is not governed, contractors may prioritise productivity or cost over environmental and regulatory obligations, exposing owners to operational, reputational and financial risk.
Our focus	We establish clear performance expectations, structured reporting, and escalation pathways aligned to closure objectives. Progress is monitored against baselines, deviations are surfaced early and corrective actions are governed to maintain alignment with approved requirements.
Outcome	Disciplined performance control that reduces variability, strengthens accountability and provides owners with assurance that closure works are delivered in accordance with approved plans and compliance obligations.

Closure governance

Contractor & execution governance

Performance Oversight

Change & Variation Control

Environmental & Safety Compliance

Mandated Execution Framework

Why it matters	Uncontrolled change creates uncertainty, inflates closure costs and undermines regulatory defensibility. Informal variation practices can conceal scope drift, increase liability and compromise environmental commitments, creating disputes and approval delays.
Our focus	We govern change approval pathways and variation evaluation, ensuring decisions are transparent, justified and aligned with approved closure plans. Commercial, environmental and schedule implications are assessed before approval to limit risk.
Outcome	Controlled and defensible change management that protects budgets, safeguards compliance and maintains predictable closure delivery under disciplined governance.

Why it matters	Closure sites carry heightened environmental and safety risk. Weak oversight can lead to non-compliance, penalties, reputational harm and increased long-term liability. Communities and regulators expect demonstrable conformance during closure, not just at completion.
Our focus	We govern environmental and safety responsibilities across contractors, ensuring execution aligns with regulatory standards and closure conditions. Reporting, monitoring and verification are structured to detect issues early and support timely intervention.
Outcome	Safer and more compliant execution that reduces exposure, protects land and workforce wellbeing and builds confidence in closure integrity and final sign-off.

Why it matters	Certain closure projects require a single accountable delivery partner rather than multiple contractors. Fragmented execution models dilute control, create interface risk and weaken ownership of performance and compliance.
Our focus	Where mandated, we execute closure works under a governed framework that integrates oversight, environmental duties and cost control. Contractor and fleet coordination can be consolidated under TacminMadini or aligned partner models for unified accountability.
Outcome	A governed execution pathway that consolidates responsibility, strengthens transparency and delivers measurable closure results under a single accountable framework, reducing complexity and long-term risk.