Rehabilitation designs, plans & tenders

Home
> Core services
> Mine rehabilitation
> Rehabilitation designs, plans & tenders

Many rehabilitation and closure projects fall short not because the environmental intent is wrong, but because the designs are not build-ready, the costing is unreliable, or the execution logic fails under real field constraints. TacminMadini closes that gap by delivering fully engineered, DCM-integrated rehabilitation packages that can be priced, sequenced, resourced, and delivered with confidence. By combining digital construction management systems with decades of mining and civil experience, we ensure every design is practical, compliant, measurable, and structured for competitive tendering or direct execution — including projects executed using an owner’s fleet.

Why it matters	Many rehabilitation and closure plans remain theoretical because execution logic is never embedded. Without integrated quantities, sequencing, construction methodology and QA requirements, well-intended designs fail to translate into practical field delivery, exposing owners to cost escalation, rework and compliance risk.
Our focus	We convert rehabilitation concepts into fully engineered, execution-ready plans. Using a DCM-enabled digital twin, we integrate quantities, sequencing, construction logic, QA checkpoints and resource models from the outset. This produces a coordinated, costed package that reflects how the works will actually be built, not just how they are intended to look on paper.
Outcome	A practical, tender-ready rehabilitation plan that is efficient, buildable and defensible — aligned with environmental obligations, safety requirements and delivery realities, and ready for direct implementation without ambiguity.

Mine rehabilitation

Rehabilitation designs, plans & tenders

Rehabilitation plan development

Cost definition & tender documentation

Integration for on-ground success

Environmental monitoring control centre

Why it matters	Cost and delivery risk often originate long before construction starts. Gaps between engineering, procurement and execution — combined with weak scope definition and poorly structured Bills of Quantities — result in inconsistent pricing, contractor disputes and early slippage that is difficult to recover once contracts are awarded.
Our focus	We prepare detailed Bills of Quantities, technical scopes and execution-ready tender documentation that reflect how the work will be delivered. Each package is aligned with safety, environmental and QA obligations and configured for DCM-based performance tracking. This ensures pricing logic is robust, responsibilities are unambiguous and performance can be monitored and enforced post-award.
Outcome	Clear, comparable tenders with accurate pricing, strong contractual definition and transparent performance control — giving owners confidence that cost, scope and delivery accountability are locked in from the outset.

Why it matters	Rehabilitation strategies often unravel on site when constructability, local capability and real-world constraints have not been properly tested. Gaps in sequencing, resourcing or quality control only become visible once machines are operating, exposing projects to rework, delays and stakeholder pressure.
Our focus	We validate constructability, sequencing, resourcing and operational readiness before mobilisation. QA frameworks, milestone validation and performance reporting are embedded from the outset to protect delivery quality and compliance. At the same time, we structure packages to maximise local workforce participation and practical site execution rather than theoretical design intent.
Outcome	Rehabilitation works that perform as intended in the field — delivering measurable, compliant outcomes, supporting local participation, and maintaining quality, schedule and cost discipline from first cut to final handover.