Delivery governance | TacminMadini

Home
> Core services
> Project delivery
> Delivery governance

TacminMadini provides independent delivery governance on behalf of asset owners, ensuring projects are executed as intended from commitment through handover. We apply end-to-end oversight across delivery models, controls and interfaces to keep cost, schedule, risk and quality aligned to approved objectives. Contracting frameworks are governed to suit scope maturity and risk, performance is monitored through disciplined controls, and interfaces across engineering, procurement and construction are actively managed. This approach protects owner intent and supports predictable, defensible outcomes aligned with long-term performance.

Why it matters	Projects lose value when engineering, procurement and execution are governed in isolation. Fragmented oversight, inconsistent information flow and disconnected decision-making introduce risk that compounds across the lifecycle, often surfacing only after cost, quality or schedule have already been compromised.
Our focus	We provide integrated delivery governance across engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning, acting on behalf of asset owners to ensure each phase remains aligned to approved intent. Interfaces are actively governed, decisions are governed consistently, and execution partners are coordinated within a single control framework that preserves transparency, accountability and value.
Outcome	Coherent, disciplined delivery from commitment through handover — reducing interface risk, maintaining control and producing outcomes that remain predictable, defensible and aligned with long-term asset performance.

Project delivery

Delivery governance & project controls

End-to-end delivery governance

Contracting & delivery model governance

Delivery controls & performance assurance

Interface & integration governance

Why it matters	Projects often fail not because of poor execution capability, but because delivery models are misaligned with scope maturity, risk profile or owner objectives. Inappropriate contract structures can transfer risk in name only, distort behaviour and undermine cost, schedule and quality outcomes.
Our focus	We govern the selection, structuring and oversight of delivery models including EPCM, EPC, cost-reimbursable, Lump Sum Turnkey and Agreed Target Cost. Acting on behalf of asset owners, we align commercial frameworks, risk allocation and incentives with execution reality, ensuring delivery models support transparency, accountability and predictable performance.
Outcome	Delivery frameworks that are fit-for-purpose, defensible and aligned with owner intent — reducing commercial risk and supporting controlled execution from award through completion.

Why it matters	Even well-structured projects can drift without disciplined controls. Weak reporting, inconsistent data and delayed intervention allow cost, schedule and quality issues to compound, often becoming visible only after value has already been lost.
Our focus	We embed robust delivery controls across cost, schedule, risk, safety and quality, supported by clear stage-gate governance and independent performance reporting. This ensures deviations are identified early, decisions remain evidence-based and corrective action can be taken before issues escalate.
Outcome	Continuous visibility and control across delivery — enabling timely intervention, reduced execution risk and confidence that outcomes remain aligned with approved plans.

Why it matters	Value is frequently lost at interfaces. When engineering, procurement and construction are governed in isolation, information gaps, misaligned decisions and unclear accountability introduce risk that compounds across the project lifecycle.
Our focus	We govern interfaces across disciplines and delivery partners, ensuring decisions, data and responsibilities remain aligned throughout execution. Engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning activities are coordinated within a single governance framework that preserves continuity, clarity and accountability across phases.
Outcome	Integrated delivery with reduced interface risk, improved coordination and outcomes that remain coherent from commitment through handover.