Early identification of conditions under which engineering and procurement decisions are unlikely to support approved feasibility intent, including an increased likelihood of:

• capital pressure arising from scope growth or pricing structures
• schedule delay embedded through procurement sequencing or contract logic
• cost escalation driven by risk allocation or incentive misalignment
• reduced flexibility once contractual commitments are executed
• divergence between approved feasibility assumptions and contractual reality

These insights are formed while commitments remain adjustable and exposure is still governable, before changes become difficult or costly to unwind.

Provides an objective basis for owner-side governance action, including:

• intervening before engineering design or procurement decisions harden
• adjusting packaging, sequencing or commercial strategy where alignment weakens
• strengthening approval discipline and clarity of authority
• preserving optionality before contractual exposure becomes fixed

This supports defensible owner governance without assuming responsibility for engineering management, procurement execution or contractor oversight.

• Insight supports owner-side governance judgement, not the direction of engineering or procurement activity.
• Patterns of emerging misalignment are identified beyond what conventional reporting typically reveals.
• Forward visibility is maintained over how contractual commitments are shaping future owner exposure as decisions harden.
• Emphasis is placed on early owner awareness and proportionate intervention, rather than post-contract remediation.
• Methods, data sources and analytical approaches remain internal to TacminMadini as part of its independent governance capability.