Identification of conditions where design or procurement decisions are unlikely to support approved feasibility outcomes, including increased likelihood of:

• capital pressure created by scope growth or pricing structure
• schedule delay embedded through procurement sequencing
• cost escalation driven by risk allocation or incentive misalignment
• reduced flexibility once contracts are executed
• divergence between approved feasibility assumptions and contractual reality

These insights are formed before commitments become difficult or costly to unwind.

Provides an objective basis for owner-side action, including:

• intervening where delivery behaviour diverges from approved intent
• clarifying authority and decision rights under pressure
• resetting governance cadence and escalation pathways
• protecting owners from unmanaged exposure during execution

This supports defensible governance without assuming delivery management or operational responsibility.

• Insight supports governance judgement rather than directing delivery activity.
• Patterns of emerging loss of control are identified beyond what standard progress reporting reveals.
• Forward visibility is maintained over whether execution trajectories remain recoverable.
• Emphasis is placed on timely owner intervention rather than post-hoc explanation of overruns.
• Specific methods, data sources and analytical approaches remain internal to TacminMadini.